Operation Rotten Tomato Case Ends in Guilty Plea
In a fascinating case arising out of the Eastern District of California that I’ve watched for the past couple of years, the government has vigorously pursued the former owner of a California based food company. The head of SK Foods, Scott Salyer, entered a surprising guilty plea Thursday to one count of racketeering and one […]
READ MOREThree Strikes: A Mistake That Led to Mass Incarceration
In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed an omnibus crime bill into law. The bill included a “three strikes” provision at the federal level, which imposed a mandatory life sentence for a criminal convicted of a violent felony after having two prior convictions. These two prior convictions could be for a huge variety of different crimes, […]
READ MOREOpenings in Two High Profile Criminal Trials: Clemens & Edwards
In former Senator John Edwards’ trial, opening statements have concluded and Edwards’ former staffer, Andrew Young, is currently on the stand, according to the Greensboro, North Carolina, News & Record. Assistant United States Attorney David Harbach emphasized Edwards’ deception and manipulation of those around him in order to preserve his chance to become President. The […]
READ MOREThe Top 10 (plus one) Drug Law Stories of 2007
Another year is wrapping up and so it is once again time to consider the most interesting drug law stories of the last 365 days. Keep in mind that I’m a California oriented blogger and my interests have to do primarily with issues that are either in criminal law or in areas of our national […]
READ MOREJudges Allows Entertainment Videos to be Used as Evidence in Trial
A federal racketeering case is currently proceeding in Brooklyn against an alleged drug gang and the U.S. District Attorney prosecuting the case asked the judge to admit mafia tattoos into evidence, as well as to admit YouTube music videos that were made by the alleged gang leader. The Brooklyn judge ruled that the videos were […]
READ MOREPeople v. Laborde: Cruise Ship Searches At The Border Generally Require No Evidence
A search of a cruise ship stateroom conducted by customs officials in Long Beach after the ship had docked on arrival from a foreign location was a “routine” border search, requiring no suspicion of criminal activity, the Second District Court of Appeal concluded today in People v. Laborde, B199726. That decision meant that a guy […]
READ MOREA Jerk is Not ALWAYS a Bully
Dan Pearce, author of Single Dad Laughing, writes, “People who love themselves don’t hurt other people. The more we hate ourselves, the more we want others to suffer.” In other words, bullies are hurt people who hurt people. Possibly, the most overused word in education is “bullying”. The word has also become overused in the […]
READ MORECA 1st: Police’s Warrantless Entry into Home Not Justified Merely Because Officer Sees Marijuana Smoking
A police officer who sees a person smoking marijuana inside their home is not justified in making a warrantless entry into that home on that basis alone, the First District Court of Appeal held Friday in People v. Hua, A116578. The police’s warrantless entry was justified, the trial court had believed, by “exigent circumstances.” However, the court […]
READ MORETwo Americas, Revisited: Perpetual Surveillance As “Reasonable” Police Activity
In today’s America, perpetual police surveillance has become the new “reasonable” status quo for certain sections of our society. Check out the lead of this weekend’s Los Angeles Times report on gang policing in L.A., for example: Saturday night, July 21, and it’s been slow in South Los Angeles, scary slow. Two Los Angeles police officers […]
READ MOREUSA Today Op-Ed Warns That Everyone is a Criminal
In the American justice system, the rule has long been that ignorance of the law is no excuse. If you are charged with a crime, claiming you didn’t know your actions were illegal is generally no defense. While this rule may have worked a century or two ago, however, some believe the principle no longer […]
READ MORE